Table of Contents
Table of Content
Preface
- What is to be done: Foundational Philosophy of the American System
- Foreword
- Introduction: A Misguided Idea of the Free Market
- Ayn Rand and the Austrian School of Economics
Part I: The Rejection of Enlightenment Values and the True Purpose of the American Political System
- Chapter 1: How Activist Indignation Leads to Extremism and Furthers the Interest of the Powerful Few
- Plato’s Republic, the Desire for a Morally Pure Politics and the Rise in Economic Inequality in 20th Century America
- Glaucon as Exemplar of the Well-Meaning Proto Fanatic
- A Connection Between Cultivated Indignation and The Naturally Powerful Few
- Chapter 2: Disenchantment with the American System and its True Function
- The Manipulation of American Values by the Powerful Few
- Chapter 3: Two Sources of Moral Indignation and Misguided Activism in the 21st Century
- Realism and Idealism in Political Life
- A Proper Response to the Crisis of Disillusioned Political Activism
- Free-market Radicalism and Disillusioned Activism on the Right
- The Enlightenment’s Defense Against the Seduction of Righteous Indignation
- Summary of Part I
Part II: Two Kinds of Freedom and the True Function of the American Paradigm: Economic Well-Being and Stability vs. Ethical Care
- Determinism and Free-market Ideology
- Chapter 1: Two Kinds of Freedom and Two Ideas of Reason
- Two Kinds of Freedom
- Chapter 2: Adam Smith and the Justification of Economic Liberty: The Meaning of Freedom and Equality in the American System
- Further Elaboration on the Difference between “Conditions of Justice” and “Outcomes”
- Self-Interest: The Dynamism at the Heart of the Enlightenment Paradigm
- The American Dilemma: The End of Self Interest as the Sole Basis of Political-Economy
Part III: Kant and Free Will as the Source of Goodness and Ethical Care
- Chapter I: The Locus of ‘the Good’ and the Conception of the Will’s Objekt: the Negative Impact of Determinism on our Moral Life
- Modern Political Thought and Our Dilemma: To Be Free or Not
- Kant and Practical Freedom: The Ability to Act on the Idea of Freedom
- Knowledge, Faith, and Free Will
- Chapter 2: Some Remarks on the Conception of the Will’s Object and the Misguided Ideas of the Free-market Movement
- Political Freedom vs. Free Will
- Chapter 3: Two Roles of the Human Person and Two Definitions of Moral Worth: The Philosophical Contradiction at the Heart of Libertarian and Randian Free-market Ideology
- The Homeric Definition of the “Good Citizen” and the Fulfillment of External Function
- Aristotle and the Difference between the “Good Man” and “Good Citizen”
Part IV: Universalism, Equality, and the Absence of the Philosophers
- “All Men are Created Equal”
- Further Elaboration of the Problem of Making Formal Values Primary
- “The Human Being does not live by Formal Values Alone”
- The Distinction between First- and Second-Order Thought: Universalism and Self-interest
- The Error of Free-market Ideology
- Further Elaboration on Universalism as the Primary Formal Value of American Civilization
- Universalism as the Primary Criterion of Paradigm Acceptability
- An Illustration: Universality and the Flaw in American Policy Toward International Trade
- Chapter 2: The Absence of the Philosopher and the Dominance of Formal Enlightenment Values
- Summary of Part IV
Part V: State of Nature Theory or the Fall of Man: The Role of Formalism in the American Paradigm and Practical Moral Judgment
- Chapter 1: Reason, Revelation, and Two Causal Foundations of Society: Modern “State of Nature” or the “Fall of Man”?
- The Formal Elements of the “Fall of Man” and modern “State of Nature” Theory: Which Construct do we Use?
- Elaboration of the Roles of Two Ideas of Causality: A Problem with the Religious Position
- Review of the Argument
- Chapter 2: The Pre-Modern State of Nature Theory and the Modern Political Project: Neutrality, Profit Seeking and Self-Interest
- Self-Interest Revisited and the Two Levels of Judgment: Illustration of the Play of Self-Interest and Confused Libertarian Second-Order Judgment
- Platonic Justice and Limits on the Pursuit of Power
- Self-interest in State of Nature Theory and Ethical Care 1
Part VI The Strongman in Western Political Thought: First- and Second-Order Judgments, Neutrality, and the Public Intellectual
- Chapter 1: Overview of Thrasymachus’ Discussion of Justice in Book I of The Republic
- Introduction to the Roles of Neutrality and Active Judgment in Western Political History
- Further Elaboration of the Role of Neutrality and Non-Neutrality
- Thrasymachus and the Three Levels of Judgment and Ethical Care
- The Four Political Types, the Public intellectual and the Ideal of Neutrality: What’s the problem?
Part VII: Thrasymachus and Platonic Justice as a Balance of Power Between the Few and the Many
- Overview of Thrasymachus’ Neutral Definition of Justice in Book I of The Republic
- Implications of the Present Discussion for Contemporary Activism 1
- Further Elaboration on Thrasymachus’’ Neutrality: A Lesson for Effective Activism
- Why Should We Reject Thrasymachus’’ Definition of Justice? 1
- The Roles of Neutrality, Judgment, and Consciousness in the Good Society
Part VIII: The Contrasting Natures of Political Justice and Moral Goodness: A Confusion of Contemporary American Activism
- Chapter I: The Goals of the Just and Good Society: Maximizing Productivity and Ethical Caring
- Kierkegaard: the Return to Subjectivity and Inner Experience
- Further Critique of the Emphasis on Epistemological Certitude 1
- Chapter 2: The Basis of Political and Ethical Good and Appropriate Stance-Taking
- Contemporary Intellectuals, Fear of Contingency and the Flight from Ethical Care and Responsibility
- Summary of the Argument
Part IX: Rousseau and The Problem with Self-Interest
- Chapter 1: Shall the Organizing Principle of Society be Self-Interest or Christian Virtue?
- Chapter 2: Summary Overview of Rousseau’s Thought and Influence
- Return to Active Judgment: Rousseau’s Problem with the Enlightenment Idea of Justice
- Rousseau: Articulating the Primary Spiritual Dilemma of American Civilization
- Chapter 3: Two Ideas of Human Motivation: Contrasting the First and Second Political Discourses to The Social Contract
- Rousseau as Upholder of Moderation
- Contrasting French and American Assumptions Regarding the Good Life
- Chapter 4: The Relevance of Rousseau to the Argument of the Book
Part X: Eric Voegelin and the Philosopher’s Role in the Creation of the Just Political Economy
- Chapter 1: Eric Voegelin on Fanaticism: The Return of Zealotry in American Politics
- The Role of the Philosopher and Classical Greek Philosophy
- “Ordered” and “Disordered” Philosophy: The Problem of Fanaticism Revisited
- Chapter 2: Moderation as the Most Important Formal Value in Western Political Thought
- Chapter 3: The Apparent Paradox of Modern Western Political Activism: The Inverse Relation between Utopian Activism and Citizen Well-Being
- Chapter 4: Saving American Politics from the Twin Scourges of Fanaticism and Authoritarianism: Return to the Search for Ethical Good and Justice
- Conclusion
Part XI: Two Kinds of Goods: Towards a New Enlightenment for American Civilization
- Revisiting the Tension Between Action and Contemplation 1
- Review of Nicomachean Ethics, Book X, Section 7-10 in Light of the Contemporary Social-Political Situation
- Chapter 1: Revisiting Two Meanings of Happiness 1
- The Merely Descriptive Basis of the Modern Idea of Happiness 1
- Chapter 2: The Two Ways of Life and the Proper Stance of the Philosopher Type: Seeking the Good and a New Enlightenment for American Civilization
- Chapter 3: The Public Intellectual, the Newtonian-Cartesian Paradigm, and Nihilism
- Summary: It’s Time to Go Back to the Cave: Call to Return to the Western Tradition of Platonic Political Philosophy
Part XII: The Movement from Justice to Goodness: “The Longer Route Around”
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Book 1
- Other Citations